
There is no reason why code documentation cannot allude to other views – especially the dynamic view and the deployment view. 4+1 architectural view model: In the 4+1 architectural view model, the development view is concerned with code.Such strict rules ensure software correctness and can be written by code comments – especially in languages that have no native support for contracts. We have the following three questions that need to be answered by this contract:
DOXYGEN DOCUMENTATION VERIFICATION

If you are trying to reduce the “odor” of code by commenting on it you better refactor the code to make it more understandable. I believe documenting the code is different from just commenting on it. But it should never be an excuse not to create code documentation. It takes time and effort to create comprehensive documentation. The operative word here is comprehensive. Without working software, comprehensive documentation is null and void. Of the four universal statements, I believe the second one is the most misunderstood.

That it values items to the left more (emphasis mine) than items to the right. Responding to change over following a plan Working software over comprehensive documentationĬustomer collaboration over contract negotiation Individuals and interactions over processes and tools Martin Fowler and Kent Beck, Refactoring, page 87 Forward “Comments often are used as a deodorant.”
DOXYGEN DOCUMENTATION HOW TO
How and why to document your code using the free tool Doxygen, make your documentation available online, and how to automate the process with free tools.
